lördag 24 januari 2009

Moral problems

Ok. So living in a huge city like this is pretty great from many points of view. Today I was in this incredibly big library, my favorite store Decathlon is placed at lots of places all over the city and there are a big range of cultural stuff like movies and theater. Unfortunately there is also a backside. Here and there you can see so called SDF:s (sans domicile fixe), homeless people. The beggars are even more common and range from young mothers with small children to old men with filthy dogs. Well, the thing is, should you give them money or shouldn't you? I have no idea how much they make in a day. Someone once told me that street musicians actually make very much. I guess that if you give them money, in a way, you encourage it and people might be less persistent in searching for a real job? On the other hand I can't imagine anyone doing that if they had any choice whatsoever. I mean, when I worked for IM, trying to get people to give money to this aid organization, people didn’t look at me like I was a worthy human. That’s the best way I can describe it. It’s a horrible feeling when everyone avoids meeting your eyes like you had the plagues. Like you’re so far below them that you don’t even exist in their world. And then I was “begging” for a good cause, I guess it must be even worse when you’re just begging for your own survival. Maybe I got my answer there, or what do you think?

Another thing that concerns France and that I have been reading about is a woman called Rachida Dati. She was the first woman from a non-European country to be chosen to a key position in the French government. As I have understood it, she was sort of an idol in the poor suburban areas here in France. She worked her way through her entire education as both her parents where poor immigrants and she was the second child of twelve. Recently, she gave birth to a baby girl. She refuses to say who the father is and says she’s going to raise the child herself. Ok, now to the point. The wind blows hard at the top and just five days after the birth she was back at work. It is not an easy thing to reach the position she has had, especially not being a woman and especially not having a foreign background. She doesn’t have few enemies and I suppose she had to defend her ground. However here in France there has been a huge debate about the whole thing. I think that a French mother has the right to 16 weeks of maternity leave. Women all over France are in a rage and say that many bosses will not allow them to stay home that long now with reference to Dati. Right, a lot of background for a short question. Should women be made to act certain ways because it gets back on all of us otherwise? I guess in Sweden the problem is the opposite. One could ask the question about whether women should be home with their children less. After all, that women put more energy into raising the children than the men is a big reason to why all of us still get less paid and have fewer top jobs. Well what do you think?

9 kommentarer:

  1. I think that the only way for a woman to be a good mother and have a top job at the same time is to have a "housebound husband" (I could not resist writing it, but I would prefer a more neutral translation of "hemmaman"). Nor do I see any way a man could be a good father without a housewife to take care of the kids. I probably is possible with both scenarios, but I can's see how. In short, I think that one parent must bear the main burden for raising the kid if the other is to be successful at work, or else the kid will be neglected. I also think that there must be an understanding for women taking maternity leave at any position. I finally believe that women must take maternity leave the first months, but that the fathers should be able to fix most of the rest with paternity leave.

    SvaraRadera
  2. Yeah, it's pretty much the same in the US. I haven't been to Paris so I can't compare, there are a lot of homeless people in large cities in US, like NYC and DC. It's really sad.
    Today at work, I had to do something in the front for about 15 minutes. I had to sell raffling tickets, all the proceeds are going to hungry families in the area. Hardly anyone did it and all they had to donate was at least $1 and I don't know how many people would have donated if there weren't a chance to win a prize.

    I think we should send all inhumane, stupid, close-minded and greedy people into space =P

    SvaraRadera
  3. Well, when it comes to the charity work you did. I believe it's not as much them looking down at you, but more them being ashamed of themselves 'cause they won't put some money forth for what you represent.

    Hard to meet someones eye when you feel a little bit ashamed inside about not approaching them and giving your aid as well.

    SvaraRadera
  4. Viktor: that wasn't the ultimate solution I was looking for. :p
    Gatito: yeah, good idea. although, i don't know what I would think about life in space *-)
    Jocke: you definitely have a point.

    SvaraRadera
  5. Well you don't have to worry about that för du är inte en sådan person :P

    SvaraRadera
  6. Can't both do a career, but work like 50-75 %. Or to hell with the career, why does that count? Family is at least as important!

    About begging, maybe ypu could give them food, or fruit or something, so they don't use money in the wrong way (like buying alcohol or drugs). I don't believe beggars are beggars 'cause they're lazy, so I don't think there's any risk in supporting their behaviour, giving beggars something is pure mercy. However, many beggars might be addicts of differnet kinds, and it's essential not to support their addiction.

    SvaraRadera
  7. yes, you do have a point. i do not often walk around with food though. also i think that people would think giving them food very odd, it is not the way here. not that i guess one should bother what people think ...

    SvaraRadera
  8. If there is someone in need (perhaps a SDF) that you meet quite often, a good idea, even though a bit unconventional, might be to approach that person. If the person seems to be a normal, nice human being (not the next Hitler or such), simply ask them if they need something. If they are the kind that don't want to use or trick people, they might say no. But if they really are in need of, let's say, food, or clothes, you'll get the point. And in the end you will have a way to help in a concrete way through action, without the risk of supporting any dangerous and destructive addictions.
    Yeah, simple idea, long explanation... :P I guess that this is the idea from which the soppkök för homeless people originates ;)
    Take care!

    SvaraRadera
  9. It's indeed very hard to know if your contributions are well invested. As you once told me about your experience in China, where young poor girls were mooching money. Your intention was to make the life of this poor little girl easier, however, the whole profit went to an illegal organization.

    Although I don't believe that is the situation in France, you still don't know where they choose to spend their gained money. So if that is your concern, I would suggest what Annika was suggesting. Give them an apple, or a cheap wrap from IKEA.

    Unfortunately, people have grown a repulsion to these what they might refer to "filthy" people. Instead the government should play their role in protecting everyone the society. Building shelters, soup kitchens etc.

    SvaraRadera